Black & Decker HS1776 Manuel d'utilisateur Page 57

  • Télécharger
  • Ajouter à mon manuel
  • Imprimer
  • Page
    / 82
  • Table des matières
  • MARQUE LIVRES
  • Noté. / 5. Basé sur avis des utilisateurs
Vue de la page 56
also prominent in the 17th century messia‑
nic movement surrounding Sabbatei Zevi in
Poland.
3
But Leibniz seems be the Secret
Master of Cantemir.
He was a radical gnostic,
whose philosophy was profoundly influen‑
ced by the Lurianic Kabbalah. Isaac Luria
(1534‑72) was perhaps the greatest of
Kabbalistic visionaries. Living and teaching
in the community of Safed, which had pro‑
duced such luminaries as Moses Cordovero
and Joseph Karo, Luria developed an origi‑
nal theosophical system which will become
the foundation for the Hasidic movement.
Luria is known chiefly through the works of
his disciples, most notably Chayyim Vital
(1543‑1620)
4
, his “Plato”. Returning to
Leibniz, once this somewhat startling fact is
understood, key areas of his philosophy,
such as his concept of monads, defense of
free will, and theodicy, can be seen in enti‑
rely new ways, which solve many of the
problems that have perplexed scholars.
5
2.
Anne Becco is the first scholar in recent
years to propose that Francis Mercury van
Helmont had a decisive influence on
Leibniz. She proves that Leibniz wrote van
Helmont’s last book, Quaedam praemeditatae
& consideratae Cogiiationes super Quatuor
priora Capita Libri Moysis, Genesis nominati...
(Thoughts on Genesis), which summarized
van Helmont’s kabbalistic ideas. On the
other hand, Leibniz was interested in van
Helmont’s kabbalistic theories to incorpora‑
te certain of them into his own philosophy.
3. Leibniz’s interest in kabbalistic doctri‑
ne is revealed by the record he kept of his
conversations with von Rosenroth. These
notes on kabbalistic ideas will be modified
and included in his later writings. Leibniz
read over the Kabbala denudata with von
Rosenroth and he will note down some
points he found most memorable: (i) that
God is an indivisible point and creation
occurs through the emanation of light; (ii)
that there is a hierarchy of “creatures”,
“souls”‘ “intelligences” or “substantial
forms” ‑ these words are used interchange
ably; (iii) that the inferior intelligences have
“fallen” become “obscured” and experience
“suffering”; (iv) that these fallen souls are
enclosed in “husks” from which they will
be slowly “extracted” through repeated
“generation”; (v) that man is the “micro‑
cosm”; (vi) that after all “souls” are even‑
3 G. Ibraileanu: “Al doilea moment, a doua plată a datoriei, a doua influență salutară străină e în veacul
al XVII‑lea în Moldova. Polonii, popor de cultură europeană grație culturii lor latine, au, încă din vea‑
cul al XVl‑lea, o mare înrâurire asupra Moldovei, înrâurire care‑și dă efectul deplin în veacul al XVII‑
lea. Acum și începe adevărata influență a civilizației Apusului asupra românilor. Polonia devine pentru
Moldova ceea ce azi e Franța pentru România, păstrând, bineînțeles, toate proporțiile.” (Spiritul critic în
cultura româneascǎ, ch. „Momentele introducerii culturii apusene, înainte de veacul al XIX‑lea”). See
also Petru Vaida, Dimitrie Cantemir şi umanismul, Bucureşti, 1972; Alexandru Duțu, Umaniştii români şi
cultura europeană, Bucureşti, 1974.
4 G. Scholem, “Vital, Hayyim Ben Joseph” in Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 10, pp. 171‑175 Jerusalem: Keter
Publishing, 1971.
5 A. P. Coudert (1995). Leibniz and the Kabbalah, Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Cantemir and the Kabbalah
55
Vue de la page 56
1 2 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ... 81 82

Commentaires sur ces manuels

Pas de commentaire